Friday, April 17, 2009

Survival of the Witiest

Thanks to Grandmere Mimi for setting me on to News Biscuit
Evolution cannot explain existence of creationists, concedes Dawkins
In a severe blow to the credibility of evolutionary science, biologist Richard Dawkins admitted today that Darwin’s theory of evolution could offer no rational explanation for the continued existence of creationists. The process of natural selection sees genes which provide an advantage in the battle for survival being preserved across generations, but scientists can find no useful purpose for the gene which leads people to believe that the earth was created in only six days about 10,000 years ago.

‘It’s a flaw in our argument, for sure,’ said Dawkins today. ‘By any reading of evolutionary theory, creationists ought to have died out ages ago. They serve no function in the planet’s ecosystem, and no other species has survived so long while in such fundamental disagreement with observable reality. If I wasn’t such an ardent believer in secular materialism, I’d wager this is really troubling Darwin in the afterlife.’ Despite Dawkins’ concession, scientists are quick to point out that recent years have seen significant advances in our understanding of the evolutionary history of creationists. Not so long ago biology was unable to trace the emergence of the species in the fossil record, but a seemingly close correlation between modern-day American creationists and National Rifle Association members suggests they descended from a group of early hunter-gatherers who exploited another sub-group naive enough to think a man wouldn’t use deadly force to protect his property, a group that is itself all but extinct except in small British enclaves where Liberal Democrats continue to thrive.

Not all biologists are convinced by this explanation, however, and a number of mavericks still cite creationists as evidence of a process of ‘natural aberration’ in which nature sometimes gets it spectacularly wrong, a theory popularised as ‘unintelligent design’. And, like their closest living relative the ostrich, the creationists have benefited considerably from the efforts of conservationists. A vast building programme dating back centuries has provided large unheated refuges in most Western towns, and some creationists have formed closed communities to strengthen their resistance to the advances of modernity. Scientists also suspect that a strong distaste for abortion and homosexuality has probably helped keep population sizes up.
Comment:  This ought to get MadPriest going.  Two of his favorite topics, Dawkins and evolution.  Too bad he's left for vacation.


Grandmère Mimi said...

MadPriest would love this one if he was around to see it. I don't know if he has internet access.

The question is, does Darwin's theory of evolution offer a rational explanation for the continued existence of fundamentalist atheists like Dawkins?

motheramelia said...

Well maybe he fits into the category of "natural aberration" "in which nature sometimes gets it spectacularly wrong." Although I would classify him as a separate species from the "unintelligent designers"

Doorman-Priest said...

I loved it too!